Paper Details

The long standing geopolitical dispute between China and Taiwan has garnered renewed attention in recent years, with escalating tensions raising concerns and the potential for military conflict. This abstract explores the multifaced dimensions of the China-Taiwan conflict, examining historical, political, and strategic factors that have shaped the current state of affairs. Beginning with a brief historical overview, the abstract delves into the complex relationship between China and Taiwan , tracing its roots back to the Chinese civil war and the subsequent establishment of separate governments on the mainland and the island. The evolution of cross-strait relations , characterized by periods of thaw and tension , is analyzed in the context of shifting domestic and international dynamics. Drawing on insights from international relations theory , the abstract examines the role of power asymmetry, identity politics, and strategic interests in driving the China-Taiwan conflict. China’s assertion of sovereignty and Taiwan’s pursuit of greater autonomy are explored as competing narratives that under their respective policies and actions. Furthermore , the abstract assesses the impact of external actors , particularly the United states , in shaping the dynamics of the China-Taiwan relationship. The role of military alliance, arms sales, and diplomatic maneuvers in exacerbating or mitigating tensions is analyzed within the broader framework of great power competition and regional security. Finally , the abstract concludes by outlining potential scenarios for the future of the China-Taiwan conflict , ranging from peaceful resolution to military confrontation. Emphasizing the importance of dialogue, diplomacy, and confidence- building measures , it underscores the need for proactive efforts to prevent escalation and promote stability in the Asia- Pacific region.

China and Taiwan war, nationalist party (Kuomintang), Russia and Ukaraine war, anti-ship ballistics (ASCMs), anti satellite (ASET) weapons, casualties, displacement, and humanitarian crisis