Paper Details

Abstract : This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of electoral systems employed in democracies globally, examining their mechanisms, implications, and efficacy. Electoral systems are pivotal in shaping political representation, government formation, and democratic legitimacy. By scrutinizing various systems including First-Past-The-Post (FPTP), Proportional Representation (PR), Mixed-Member Proportional (MMP), Single Transferable Vote (STV), Majoritarian Systems, and Parallel Systems, this study explores their distinctive features, strengths, and limitations.Each electoral system is evaluated across multiple dimensions including representation accuracy, proportionality, voter engagement, stability, and inclusivity. For instance, while FPTP, prevalent in the UK and the US, tends to produce decisive outcomes, it may overlook minority interests. In contrast, PR systems, observed in Germany and the Netherlands, prioritize proportional representation but often result in coalition governments, the analysis underscores the significance of contextual factors and societal preferences in shaping the effectiveness of electoral systems. It emphasizes the absence of a universally superior electoral model and advocates for informed decision-making processes tailored to specific socio-political contexts. By fostering understanding and critical evaluation of electoral systems, this research aims to contribute to the enhancement of democratic governance worldwide, promoting fairness, representation, and public trust in electoral process.

Electoral reforms , Democracies, Fast Past the Post , Elections